Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H vs Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H
Between the Cordless Pro IZ862H and Stratos Cordless IZ862H, the Cordless Pro IZ862H comes out ahead in suction (aw) and weight, while the Stratos Cordless IZ862H wins on several specs. Overall, the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 70.7 and the Stratos Cordless IZ862H scores 64.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Cordless Pro IZ862H edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.7 vs 64.6), but the 6.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are suction (aw), weight.
The Stratos Cordless IZ862H similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable battery, dustbin, cordless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Cordless Pro IZ862H is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 16.67% more. 175 vs 150.
- ▲Weight — 0.10 kg less. 3.5 vs 3.6.
Why Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 175lead | 150 |
| Dustbin | 0.7 L | 0.7 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Shark - Stratos Cordless IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.5 kglead | 3.6 kg |
| Battery | 60 min | 60 min |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.