Skip to content
vsMars
スペック詳細 · リフレッシュレート

C5 OLED 77 vs S95F QD-OLED 77

リフレッシュレートを並べて確認。

LG · C5 OLED 77
144Hz
Samsung · S95F QD-OLED 77
165Hz
優位
判定S95F QD-OLED 77 リフレッシュレートで優位です。
背景

リフレッシュレートを理解する

リフレッシュレート is a numeric spec measured in Hz. On this metric, higher values are generally better, but returns diminish past category-typical thresholds — going from a low value to a mid value usually matters far more than going from a mid value to a high one. When comparing two products, focus on the percentage gap rather than the raw delta: a 200-unit lead means something very different at the low end of the range than at the high end. Pay attention to the unit, too — manufacturers sometimes quote peak or burst figures that are not sustained in real-world use. Cross-check the published number against independent measurements where possible, especially for performance and battery claims. Finally, remember that a single spec rarely tells the whole story; the Mars Score weighs リフレッシュレート together with the rest of the spec sheet so one outlier doesn't distort the verdict.

この対戦S95F QD-OLED 77's 165Hz is roughly 15% higher than C5 OLED 77's 144Hz (a 21Hz gap). Whether that gap is noticeable depends on workload — small percentage gaps rarely change day-to-day experience, while gaps of 20% or more usually do.

さらに詳しく

この比較の他のスペック

完全な テレビ カテゴリをMars Score順で見る。