Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Audio-Technica - ATH-M50xBT2 vs Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300

Last updated · How Mars Score works
ATH-M50xBT2AUDIO-TECHNICARENDER
Probe A
Audio-Technica
ATH-M50xBT2
74.2/ 100B
Audio81· 45%
Battery62· 25%
Connectivity· 18%
Design· 12%
Aventho 300BEYERDYNAMICRENDER
Probe B
Beyerdynamic
Aventho 300
72.6/ 100B
Audio75· 45%
Battery67· 25%
Connectivity· 18%
Design· 12%
Quick verdict

Between the ATH-M50xBT2 and Aventho 300, the ATH-M50xBT2 comes out ahead in driver size, while the Aventho 300 wins on weight and battery life. Overall, the ATH-M50xBT2 scores 74.2 and the Aventho 300 scores 72.6 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (74.2 vs 72.6). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the ATH-M50xBT2 if you care most about driver size. The biggest gaps in its favor are driver size.

Pick the Aventho 300 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are weight, battery life, active noise cancellation.

Both ship with comparable spatial audio, multipoint, ldac, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Audio-Technica - ATH-M50xBT2 wins

  • Driver size — 12.50% more. 45 mm vs 40 mm.

Why Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300 wins

  • Weight — 47.00 g less. 260 vs 307.
  • Battery life — 20.00% more. 60 h vs 50 h.
  • Has Active noise cancellation.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecAudio-Technica - ATH-M50xBT2Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300
Typeover-earover-ear
Weight307 g260 glead
Water resistancenonenone

Audio

SpecAudio-Technica - ATH-M50xBT2Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300
Driver size45 mmlead40 mm
Impedance38 Ωlead32 Ω
Sensitivity99 dB100 dBlead
Active noise cancellationfalsetruelead
Transparency modefalsetruelead
Spatial audiofalsefalse

Battery

SpecAudio-Technica - ATH-M50xBT2Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300
Battery life50 h60 hlead
Fast chargetruetrue

Connectivity

SpecAudio-Technica - ATH-M50xBT2Beyerdynamic - Aventho 300
Bluetooth5.05.3lead
Multipointtruetrue
3.5mm jacktruetrue
LDACtruetrue
aptX HDtruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery life, ATH-M50xBT2 or Aventho 300?+

Aventho 300 lasts 60 hours vs 50 hours.

Do ATH-M50xBT2 or Aventho 300 have active noise cancellation?+

Aventho 300 has ANC; ATH-M50xBT2 does not.

Which supports LDAC, ATH-M50xBT2 or Aventho 300?+

Both support LDAC.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.