Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Samsung - Galaxy S26 vs Apple - iPhone 17 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Galaxy S26SAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy S26
64.6/ 100C
Performance71· 25%
Battery50· 20%
Display65· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
iPhone 17 ProAPPLERENDER
Probe B
Apple
iPhone 17 Pro
63.4/ 100C
Performance70· 25%
Battery46· 20%
Display66· 18%
Cameras69· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Galaxy S26 and iPhone 17 Pro, the Galaxy S26 comes out ahead in wired charging and weight, while the iPhone 17 Pro wins on wireless charging and pixel density. Overall, the Galaxy S26 scores 64.6 and the iPhone 17 Pro scores 63.4 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (64.6 vs 63.4). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the Galaxy S26 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are wired charging, weight, battery capacity, among others.

Pick the iPhone 17 Pro if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are wireless charging, pixel density, screen size.

Both ship with comparable ram, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Samsung - Galaxy S26 wins

  • Wired charging — 50.00% more. 45 W vs 30 W.
  • Weight — 35.00 g less. 168 vs 203.
  • Battery capacity — 8.34% more. 4000 mAh vs 3692 mAh.
  • Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
  • AnTuTu — 3.37% more. 2150000 vs 2080000.
  • Promised OS updates: 7 (vs 6).

Why Apple - iPhone 17 Pro wins

  • Wireless charging — 66.67% more. 25 W vs 15 W.
  • Pixel density — 8.24% more. 460 ppi vs 425 ppi.
  • Screen size — 1.61% more. 6.3 " vs 6.2 ".
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro
Weight168 glead203 g
Thickness7.4 mmlead8.3 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro
Screen size6.2 "6.3 "lead
Pixel density425 ppi460 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2400 nitslead2200 nits

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage256 GB256 GB
AnTuTu2150000lead2080000
CPU total clock22.0 GHzlead20.4 GHz

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro
Main camera50 MPlead48 MP
Front camera12 MP12 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro
Battery capacity4000 mAhlead3692 mAh
Wired charging45 Wlead30 W
Wireless charging15 W25 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26Apple - iPhone 17 Pro
OSAndroidiOSlead
Promised OS updates7 yearslead6 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Galaxy S26 or iPhone 17 Pro?+

Galaxy S26 has 8.3% more battery — 4000 mAh vs 3692 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy S26 or iPhone 17 Pro?+

Galaxy S26 is 35g lighter — 168g vs 203g.

Is Galaxy S26 waterproof?+

Galaxy S26 has an IP68 rating.

Does iPhone 17 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, iPhone 17 Pro supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy S26 or iPhone 17 Pro?+

Galaxy S26 has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.