Between the iPhone 16 Pro and X Fold 3 Pro, the iPhone 16 Pro comes out ahead in weight and pixel density, while the X Fold 3 Pro wins on wired charging and front camera. Overall, the iPhone 16 Pro scores 60.6 and the X Fold 3 Pro scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.
어느 것을 사야 할까요?
The X Fold 3 Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.5 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the iPhone 16 Pro if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density, promised os updates.
Pick the X Fold 3 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are wired charging, front camera, ram, among others.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, 5g support, optical image stabilization, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X Fold 3 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Apple - iPhone 16 Pro이(가) 이기는 이유
- ▲Weight — 37.00 g less. 199 vs 236.
- ▲Pixel density — 14.43% more. 460 ppi vs 402 ppi.
- ▲Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).
Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro이(가) 이기는 이유
- ▲Wired charging — 270.37% more. 100 W vs 27 W.
- ▲Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
- ▲RAM — 100.00% more. 16 GB vs 8 GB.
- ▲Wireless charging — 100.00% more. 50 W vs 25 W.
- ▲Battery capacity — 59.13% more. 5700 mAh vs 3582 mAh.
- ▲Screen size — 27.46% more. 8.03 " vs 6.3 ".
- ▲AnTuTu — 18.29% more. 2070000 vs 1750000.
- ▲Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
사양 비교
Design
| 사양 | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 glead | 236 g |
| Thickness | 8.25 mmlead | 11.2 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68 | IPX8lead |
| Form factor | bar | foldable_booklead |
Display
| 사양 | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.3 " | 8.03 "lead |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 460 ppilead | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2000 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| 사양 | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 48 MP | 50 MPlead |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MPlead |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| 사양 | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 3582 mAh | 5700 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 27 W | 100 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 25 W | 50 Wlead |
Connectivity
| 사양 | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| 사양 | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | iOSlead | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 5 yearslead | 4 years |
자주 묻는 질문
Which has better battery, iPhone 16 Pro or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro has 59.1% more battery — 3582 mAh vs 5700 mAh.
Which is lighter, iPhone 16 Pro or X Fold 3 Pro?+
iPhone 16 Pro is 37g lighter — 199g vs 236g.
Is iPhone 16 Pro waterproof?+
iPhone 16 Pro has an IP68 rating.
Does X Fold 3 Pro support 5G?+
Yes, X Fold 3 Pro supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, iPhone 16 Pro or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, iPhone 16 Pro or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.
사양별 심층 분석
같은 브랜드의 더 보기
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.