Between the iPhone 16 Pro and X200, the iPhone 16 Pro comes out ahead in weight and promised os updates, while the X200 wins on wired charging and front camera. Overall, the iPhone 16 Pro scores 60.6 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 11.1 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the iPhone 16 Pro if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, promised os updates.
Pick the X200 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are wired charging, front camera, battery capacity, among others.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, 5g support, water resistance, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X200 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Apple - iPhone 16 Pro wins
- ▲Weight — 3.00 g less. 199 vs 202.
- ▲Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).
Why Vivo - X200 wins
- ▲Wired charging — 233.33% more. 90 W vs 27 W.
- ▲Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
- ▲Battery capacity — 61.92% more. 5800 mAh vs 3582 mAh.
- ▲RAM — 50.00% more. 12 GB vs 8 GB.
- ▲AnTuTu — 49.71% more. 2620000 vs 1750000.
- ▲Wireless charging — 20.00% more. 30 W vs 25 W.
- ▲Screen size — 5.87% more. 6.67 " vs 6.3 ".
- ▲Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 glead | 202 g |
| Thickness | 8.25 mm | 8.0 mmlead |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68 | IP68 |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.3 " | 6.67 "lead |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2000 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 48 MP | 50 MPlead |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MPlead |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 3582 mAh | 5800 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 27 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 25 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X200 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | iOSlead | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 5 yearslead | 4 years |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, iPhone 16 Pro or X200?+
X200 has 61.9% more battery — 3582 mAh vs 5800 mAh.
Which is lighter, iPhone 16 Pro or X200?+
iPhone 16 Pro is 3g lighter — 199g vs 202g.
Is iPhone 16 Pro waterproof?+
iPhone 16 Pro has an IP68 rating.
Does X200 support 5G?+
Yes, X200 supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, iPhone 16 Pro or X200?+
X200 offers 12GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, iPhone 16 Pro or X200?+
X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.