Between the iPhone 16 Pro and X200 Pro, the iPhone 16 Pro comes out ahead in weight and pixel density, while the X200 Pro wins on wired charging and front camera. Overall, the iPhone 16 Pro scores 60.6 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 13.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the iPhone 16 Pro if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density, promised os updates.
Pick the X200 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are wired charging, front camera, ram, among others.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, 5g support, optical image stabilization, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X200 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Apple - iPhone 16 Pro wins
- ▲Weight — 24.00 g less. 199 vs 223.
- ▲Pixel density — 1.77% more. 460 ppi vs 452 ppi.
- ▲Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).
Why Vivo - X200 Pro wins
- ▲Wired charging — 233.33% more. 90 W vs 27 W.
- ▲Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
- ▲RAM — 100.00% more. 16 GB vs 8 GB.
- ▲Battery capacity — 67.50% more. 6000 mAh vs 3582 mAh.
- ▲AnTuTu — 56.57% more. 2740000 vs 1750000.
- ▲Wireless charging — 20.00% more. 30 W vs 25 W.
- ▲Screen size — 7.62% more. 6.78 " vs 6.3 ".
- ▲Main camera — 4.17% more. 50 MP vs 48 MP.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 glead | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.25 mmlead | 8.5 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68 | IP69lead |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.3 " | 6.78 "lead |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 460 ppilead | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2000 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 48 MP | 50 MPlead |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MPlead |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 3582 mAh | 6000 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 27 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 25 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 Pro | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | iOSlead | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 5 yearslead | 4 years |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, iPhone 16 Pro or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro has 67.5% more battery — 3582 mAh vs 6000 mAh.
Which is lighter, iPhone 16 Pro or X200 Pro?+
iPhone 16 Pro is 24g lighter — 199g vs 223g.
Is iPhone 16 Pro waterproof?+
iPhone 16 Pro has an IP68 rating.
Does X200 Pro support 5G?+
Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, iPhone 16 Pro or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, iPhone 16 Pro or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.