Between the iPhone 16 and X Fold 3 Pro, the iPhone 16 comes out ahead in weight and pixel density, while the X Fold 3 Pro wins on wired charging and wireless charging. Overall, the iPhone 16 scores 57.4 and the X Fold 3 Pro scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X Fold 3 Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 15.7 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the iPhone 16 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight, pixel density, promised os updates.
Pick the X Fold 3 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are wired charging, wireless charging, front camera, among others.
Both ship with comparable 5g support, optical image stabilization, headphone jack, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X Fold 3 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Apple - iPhone 16 wins
- ▲Weight — 66.00 g less. 170 vs 236.
- ▲Pixel density — 14.43% more. 460 ppi vs 402 ppi.
- ▲Promised OS updates: 5 (vs 4).
Why Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro wins
- ▲Wired charging — 400.00% more. 100 W vs 20 W.
- ▲Wireless charging — 233.33% more. 50 W vs 15 W.
- ▲Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
- ▲RAM — 100.00% more. 16 GB vs 8 GB.
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 120 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Battery capacity — 60.07% more. 5700 mAh vs 3561 mAh.
- ▲Screen size — 31.64% more. 8.03 " vs 6.1 ".
- ▲AnTuTu — 27.78% more. 2070000 vs 1620000.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 170 glead | 236 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mmlead | 11.2 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP68 | IPX8lead |
| Form factor | bar | foldable_booklead |
Display
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.1 " | 8.03 "lead |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 460 ppilead | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 60 Hz | 120 Hzlead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2000 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 48 MP | 50 MPlead |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MPlead |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 3561 mAh | 5700 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 20 W | 100 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 15 W | 50 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Apple - iPhone 16 | Vivo - X Fold 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | iOSlead | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 5 yearslead | 4 years |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, iPhone 16 or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro has 60.1% more battery — 3561 mAh vs 5700 mAh.
Which is lighter, iPhone 16 or X Fold 3 Pro?+
iPhone 16 is 66g lighter — 170g vs 236g.
Is iPhone 16 waterproof?+
iPhone 16 has an IP68 rating.
Does X Fold 3 Pro support 5G?+
Yes, X Fold 3 Pro supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, iPhone 16 or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, iPhone 16 or X Fold 3 Pro?+
X Fold 3 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 48 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.