Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Nothing - Phone (3a) vs Vivo - X200

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Phone (3a)NOTHINGRENDER
Probe A
Nothing
Phone (3a)
62.5/ 100C
Performance51· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200VIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200
71.7/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery72· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Phone (3a) and X200, the Phone (3a) comes out ahead in screen size and weight, while the X200 wins on antutu and wired charging. Overall, the Phone (3a) scores 62.5 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The X200 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 9.2 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the Phone (3a) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are screen size, weight.

Pick the X200 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are antutu, wired charging, ram, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the X200 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Nothing - Phone (3a) wins

  • Screen size — 1.50% more. 6.77 " vs 6.67 ".
  • Weight — 1.00 g less. 201 vs 202.

Why Vivo - X200 wins

  • AnTuTu — 219.51% more. 2620000 vs 820000.
  • Wired charging — 80.00% more. 90 W vs 50 W.
  • RAM — 50.00% more. 12 GB vs 8 GB.
  • Pixel density — 18.86% more. 460 ppi vs 387 ppi.
  • Battery capacity — 16.00% more. 5800 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
  • Water resistance: IP68 (vs IP64).
  • Promised OS updates: 4 (vs 3).
  • Wireless charging: 30 W vs 0 W.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecNothing - Phone (3a)Vivo - X200
Weight201 glead202 g
Thickness8.4 mm8.0 mmlead
Water resistanceIP64IP68lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecNothing - Phone (3a)Vivo - X200
Screen size6.77 "lead6.67 "
Pixel density387 ppi460 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3000 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecNothing - Phone (3a)Vivo - X200
RAM8 GB12 GBlead
Storage128 GB256 GBlead
AnTuTu8200002620000lead
CPU total clock10.8 GHz22.4 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecNothing - Phone (3a)Vivo - X200
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera32 MP32 MP
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecNothing - Phone (3a)Vivo - X200
Battery capacity5000 mAh5800 mAhlead
Wired charging50 W90 Wlead
Wireless charging0 W30 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecNothing - Phone (3a)Vivo - X200
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecNothing - Phone (3a)Vivo - X200
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates3 years4 yearslead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Phone (3a) or X200?+

X200 has 16.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 5800 mAh.

Which is lighter, Phone (3a) or X200?+

Phone (3a) is 1g lighter — 201g vs 202g.

Is Phone (3a) waterproof?+

Phone (3a) has an IP64 rating.

Does X200 support 5G?+

Yes, X200 supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Phone (3a) or X200?+

X200 offers 12GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Phone (3a) or X200?+

X200 has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.