Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Realme - GT Neo 7 vs Vivo - X200 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
GT Neo 7REALMERENDER
Probe A
Realme
GT Neo 7
74.0/ 100B
Performance71· 25%
Battery85· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200 ProVIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200 Pro
74.0/ 100B
Performance79· 25%
Battery74· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the GT Neo 7 and X200 Pro, the GT Neo 7 comes out ahead in battery capacity and weight, while the X200 Pro wins on front camera and ram. Overall, the GT Neo 7 scores 74 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are evenly matched on the broad strokes, with the decision sitting on which individual spec advantages weigh more for your use.

Pick the GT Neo 7 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery capacity, weight, wired charging.

Pick the X200 Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are front camera, ram, antutu, among others.

Both ship with comparable main camera, screen size, refresh rate, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Realme - GT Neo 7 wins

  • Battery capacity — 16.67% more. 7000 mAh vs 6000 mAh.
  • Weight — 16.00 g less. 207 vs 223.
  • Wired charging — 11.11% more. 100 W vs 90 W.

Why Vivo - X200 Pro wins

  • Front camera — 100.00% more. 32 MP vs 16 MP.
  • RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
  • AnTuTu — 31.73% more. 2740000 vs 2080000.
  • Water resistance: IP69 (vs IP65).
  • Promised OS updates: 4 (vs 3).
  • Pixel density — 0.44% more. 452 ppi vs 450 ppi.
  • Wireless charging: 30 W vs 0 W.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecRealme - GT Neo 7Vivo - X200 Pro
Weight207 glead223 g
Thickness8.4 mmlead8.5 mm
Water resistanceIP65IP69lead
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecRealme - GT Neo 7Vivo - X200 Pro
Screen size6.78 "6.78 "
Pixel density450 ppi452 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness6000 nitslead4500 nits

Performance

SpecRealme - GT Neo 7Vivo - X200 Pro
RAM12 GB16 GBlead
Storage256 GB512 GBlead
AnTuTu20800002740000lead
CPU total clock21.4 GHz23.2 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecRealme - GT Neo 7Vivo - X200 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Front camera16 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecRealme - GT Neo 7Vivo - X200 Pro
Battery capacity7000 mAhlead6000 mAh
Wired charging100 Wlead90 W
Wireless charging0 W30 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecRealme - GT Neo 7Vivo - X200 Pro
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecRealme - GT Neo 7Vivo - X200 Pro
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates3 years4 yearslead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, GT Neo 7 or X200 Pro?+

GT Neo 7 has 16.7% more battery — 7000 mAh vs 6000 mAh.

Which is lighter, GT Neo 7 or X200 Pro?+

GT Neo 7 is 16g lighter — 207g vs 223g.

Is GT Neo 7 waterproof?+

GT Neo 7 has an IP65 rating.

Does X200 Pro support 5G?+

Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, GT Neo 7 or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, GT Neo 7 or X200 Pro?+

X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.