Between the CMF Phone 1 and X200 Pro, the CMF Phone 1 comes out ahead in weight, while the X200 Pro wins on antutu and wired charging. Overall, the CMF Phone 1 scores 61.4 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X200 Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the CMF Phone 1 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight.
Pick the X200 Pro if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are antutu, wired charging, ram, among others.
Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X200 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Nothing - CMF Phone 1 wins
- ▲Weight — 26.00 g less. 197 vs 223.
Why Vivo - X200 Pro wins
- ▲AnTuTu — 389.29% more. 2740000 vs 560000.
- ▲Wired charging — 172.73% more. 90 W vs 33 W.
- ▲RAM — 100.00% more. 16 GB vs 8 GB.
- ▲Front camera — 100.00% more. 32 MP vs 16 MP.
- ▲Battery capacity — 20.00% more. 6000 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
- ▲Pixel density — 14.43% more. 452 ppi vs 395 ppi.
- ▲Screen size — 1.65% more. 6.78 " vs 6.67 ".
- ▲Has Optical image stabilization.
Spec comparison
Design
| Spec | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 197 glead | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mmlead | 8.5 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP52 | IP69lead |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| Spec | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.67 " | 6.78 "lead |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 395 ppi | 452 ppilead |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 2000 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MPlead |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | false | truelead |
Battery
| Spec | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 33 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 0 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | truelead | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Nothing - CMF Phone 1 | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 2 years | 4 yearslead |
Frequently asked
Which has better battery, CMF Phone 1 or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro has 20.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 6000 mAh.
Which is lighter, CMF Phone 1 or X200 Pro?+
CMF Phone 1 is 26g lighter — 197g vs 223g.
Is CMF Phone 1 waterproof?+
CMF Phone 1 has an IP52 rating.
Does X200 Pro support 5G?+
Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, CMF Phone 1 or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, CMF Phone 1 or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.