Between the XM2we and Pulsefire Haste 2, the XM2we comes out ahead in wireless and battery, while the Pulsefire Haste 2 wins on polling rate and weight. Overall, the XM2we scores 69.6 and the Pulsefire Haste 2 scores 84.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Pulsefire Haste 2 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 15.0 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the XM2we if you care most about wireless and battery. The biggest gaps in its favor are wireless, battery.
Pick the Pulsefire Haste 2 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are polling rate, weight.
Both ship with comparable max dpi, buttons, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Pulsefire Haste 2 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Endgame Gear - XM2we wins
- ▲Wireless: true (vs false).
- ▲Battery: 90 h vs 0 h.
Why HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 wins
- ▲Polling rate — 700.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 1000 Hz.
- ▲Weight — 2.00 g less. 61 vs 63.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 26000 |
| Max IPS | 650 | 650 |
| Polling rate | 1000 Hz | 8000 Hzlead |
Design
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 63 g | 61 glead |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Endgame Gear - XM2we | HyperX - Pulsefire Haste 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | truelead | false |
| Battery | 90 hlead | 0 h |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.