Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Samsung - Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Nothing - Phone (3)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Galaxy S26 UltraSAMSUNGRENDER
Probe A
Samsung
Galaxy S26 Ultra
75.6/ 100B
Performance77· 25%
Battery63· 20%
Display72· 18%
Cameras92· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Phone (3)NOTHINGRENDER
Probe B
Nothing
Phone (3)
68.7/ 100B
Performance71· 25%
Battery64· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Galaxy S26 Ultra and Phone (3), the Galaxy S26 Ultra comes out ahead in main camera and ram, while the Phone (3) wins on front camera and weight. Overall, the Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 75.6 and the Phone (3) scores 68.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Galaxy S26 Ultra edges ahead on the Mars Score (75.6 vs 68.7), but the 6.9-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the Galaxy S26 Ultra if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. The biggest gaps in its favor are main camera, ram, antutu, among others.

Pick the Phone (3) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are front camera, weight, battery capacity.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, 5g support, water resistance, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the Galaxy S26 Ultra is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Samsung - Galaxy S26 Ultra wins

  • Main camera — 300.00% more. 200 MP vs 50 MP.
  • RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
  • AnTuTu — 12.68% more. 2310000 vs 2050000.
  • Pixel density — 8.91% more. 501 ppi vs 460 ppi.
  • Screen size — 2.99% more. 6.9 " vs 6.7 ".
  • Promised OS updates: 7 (vs 5).

Why Nothing - Phone (3) wins

  • Front camera — 166.67% more. 32 MP vs 12 MP.
  • Weight — 36.00 g less. 196 vs 232.
  • Battery capacity — 3.00% more. 5150 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraNothing - Phone (3)
Weight232 g196 glead
Thickness8.6 mm8.4 mmlead
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraNothing - Phone (3)
Screen size6.9 "lead6.7 "
Pixel density501 ppilead460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2600 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraNothing - Phone (3)
RAM16 GBlead12 GB
Storage512 GBlead256 GB
AnTuTu2310000lead2050000
CPU total clock22.8 GHzlead21.6 GHz

Cameras

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraNothing - Phone (3)
Main camera200 MPlead50 MP
Front camera12 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraNothing - Phone (3)
Battery capacity5000 mAh5150 mAhlead
Wired charging65 W65 W
Wireless charging15 W15 W

Connectivity

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraNothing - Phone (3)
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecSamsung - Galaxy S26 UltraNothing - Phone (3)
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates7 yearslead5 years
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Galaxy S26 Ultra or Phone (3)?+

Phone (3) has 3.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 5150 mAh.

Which is lighter, Galaxy S26 Ultra or Phone (3)?+

Phone (3) is 36g lighter — 232g vs 196g.

Is Galaxy S26 Ultra waterproof?+

Galaxy S26 Ultra has an IP68 rating.

Does Phone (3) support 5G?+

Yes, Phone (3) supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Galaxy S26 Ultra or Phone (3)?+

Galaxy S26 Ultra offers 16GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Galaxy S26 Ultra or Phone (3)?+

Galaxy S26 Ultra has a 200 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.