Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Honor - Magic7 Lite vs Vivo - X200

Last updated · How Mars Score works
Magic7 LiteHONORRENDER
Probe A
Honor
Magic7 Lite
69.2/ 100B
Performance48· 25%
Battery80· 20%
Display70· 18%
Cameras82· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
X200VIVORENDER
Probe B
Vivo
X200
71.7/ 100B
Performance74· 25%
Battery72· 20%
Display69· 18%
Cameras70· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the Magic7 Lite and X200, the Magic7 Lite comes out ahead in main camera and battery capacity, while the X200 wins on antutu and front camera. Overall, the Magic7 Lite scores 69.2 and the X200 scores 71.7 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (69.2 vs 71.7). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the Magic7 Lite if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are main camera, battery capacity, weight, among others.

Pick the X200 if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. Its strongest claims are antutu, front camera, ram, among others.

Both ship with comparable refresh rate, 5g support, water resistance, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Honor - Magic7 Lite wins

  • Main camera — 116.00% more. 108 MP vs 50 MP.
  • Battery capacity — 13.79% more. 6600 mAh vs 5800 mAh.
  • Weight — 13.00 g less. 189 vs 202.
  • Screen size — 1.65% more. 6.78 " vs 6.67 ".

Why Vivo - X200 wins

  • AnTuTu — 303.08% more. 2620000 vs 650000.
  • Front camera — 100.00% more. 32 MP vs 16 MP.
  • RAM — 50.00% more. 12 GB vs 8 GB.
  • Wired charging — 36.36% more. 90 W vs 66 W.
  • Pixel density — 16.46% more. 460 ppi vs 395 ppi.
  • Promised OS updates: 4 (vs 3).
  • Wireless charging: 30 W vs 0 W.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200
Weight189 glead202 g
Thickness7.98 mmlead8.0 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200
Screen size6.78 "lead6.67 "
Pixel density395 ppi460 ppilead
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3500 nits4500 nitslead

Performance

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200
RAM8 GB12 GBlead
Storage256 GB256 GB
AnTuTu6500002620000lead
CPU total clock9.0 GHz22.4 GHzlead

Cameras

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200
Main camera108 MPlead50 MP
Front camera16 MP32 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200
Battery capacity6600 mAhlead5800 mAh
Wired charging66 W90 Wlead
Wireless charging0 W30 Wlead

Connectivity

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecHonor - Magic7 LiteVivo - X200
OSAndroidAndroid
Promised OS updates3 years4 yearslead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, Magic7 Lite or X200?+

Magic7 Lite has 13.8% more battery — 6600 mAh vs 5800 mAh.

Which is lighter, Magic7 Lite or X200?+

Magic7 Lite is 13g lighter — 189g vs 202g.

Is Magic7 Lite waterproof?+

Magic7 Lite has an IP68 rating.

Does X200 support 5G?+

Yes, X200 supports 5G.

Which has more RAM, Magic7 Lite or X200?+

X200 offers 12GB of RAM.

Which has a better camera, Magic7 Lite or X200?+

Magic7 Lite has a 108 MP main camera vs 50 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.