Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Apple - iPhone 16 Pro vs Google - Pixel 9a

Last updated · How Mars Score works
iPhone 16 ProAPPLERENDER
Probe A
Apple
iPhone 16 Pro
60.6/ 100C
Performance62· 25%
Battery45· 20%
Display66· 18%
Cameras69· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Pixel 9aGOOGLERENDER
Probe B
Google
Pixel 9a
63.2/ 100C
Performance57· 25%
Battery64· 20%
Display66· 18%
Cameras69· 18%
Design· 8%
Connectivity· 7%
Operating System· 4%
Quick verdict

Between the iPhone 16 Pro and Pixel 9a, the iPhone 16 Pro comes out ahead in wireless charging and antutu, while the Pixel 9a wins on battery capacity and weight. Overall, the iPhone 16 Pro scores 60.6 and the Pixel 9a scores 63.2 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (60.6 vs 63.2). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the iPhone 16 Pro if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. The biggest gaps in its favor are wireless charging, antutu, wired charging, among others.

Pick the Pixel 9a if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are battery capacity, weight, front camera, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, main camera, screen size, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why Apple - iPhone 16 Pro wins

  • Wireless charging — 233.33% more. 25 W vs 7.5 W.
  • AnTuTu — 41.13% more. 1750000 vs 1240000.
  • Wired charging — 17.39% more. 27 W vs 23 W.
  • Pixel density — 9.00% more. 460 ppi vs 422 ppi.

Why Google - Pixel 9a wins

  • Battery capacity — 42.38% more. 5100 mAh vs 3582 mAh.
  • Weight — 13.00 g less. 186 vs 199.
  • Front camera — 8.33% more. 13 MP vs 12 MP.
  • Promised OS updates: 7 (vs 5).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProGoogle - Pixel 9a
Weight199 g186 glead
Thickness8.25 mmlead8.9 mm
Water resistanceIP68IP68
Form factorbarbar

Display

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProGoogle - Pixel 9a
Screen size6.3 "6.3 "
Pixel density460 ppilead422 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2000 nits2700 nitslead

Performance

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProGoogle - Pixel 9a
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage256 GBlead128 GB
AnTuTu1750000lead1240000
CPU total clock17.8 GHzlead14.6 GHz

Cameras

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProGoogle - Pixel 9a
Main camera48 MP48 MP
Front camera12 MP13 MPlead
Optical image stabilizationtruetrue

Battery

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProGoogle - Pixel 9a
Battery capacity3582 mAh5100 mAhlead
Wired charging27 Wlead23 W
Wireless charging25 Wlead7.5 W

Connectivity

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProGoogle - Pixel 9a
5G supporttruetrue
Headphone jackfalsefalse
microSD slotfalsefalse

Operating System

SpecApple - iPhone 16 ProGoogle - Pixel 9a
OSiOSleadAndroid
Promised OS updates5 years7 yearslead
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery, iPhone 16 Pro or Pixel 9a?+

Pixel 9a has 42.4% more battery — 3582 mAh vs 5100 mAh.

Which is lighter, iPhone 16 Pro or Pixel 9a?+

Pixel 9a is 13g lighter — 199g vs 186g.

Is iPhone 16 Pro waterproof?+

iPhone 16 Pro has an IP68 rating.

Does Pixel 9a support 5G?+

Yes, Pixel 9a supports 5G.

Which has a better camera, iPhone 16 Pro or Pixel 9a?+

Pixel 9a has a 48 MP main camera vs 48 MP.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.