LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B vs Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture)
Between the UltraGear 27GP950-B and Studio Display (Nano-texture), the UltraGear 27GP950-B comes out ahead in refresh rate and response time (gtg), while the Studio Display (Nano-texture) wins on dci-p3 coverage. Overall, the UltraGear 27GP950-B scores 78.2 and the Studio Display (Nano-texture) scores 56.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The UltraGear 27GP950-B is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 22.1 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the UltraGear 27GP950-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, response time (gtg), g-sync, among others.
Pick the Studio Display (Nano-texture) if you care most about dci-p3 coverage. Its strongest claims are dci-p3 coverage.
Both ship with comparable peak brightness, screen size, panel type, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the UltraGear 27GP950-B is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 166.67% more. 160 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 87.50% less. 1 ms vs 8 ms.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
Why Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) wins
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B | Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 27 " | 27 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 5Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B | Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 160 Hzlead | 60 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 1 mslead | 8 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 600 nits | 600 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 98 % | 99 %lead |
| HDRⓘ | truelead | false |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| Spec | LG - UltraGear 27GP950-B | Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 0 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1lead | 0 |
| USB-C input | false | truelead |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | — | 96 W |
| KVM | false | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 27GP950-B or Studio Display (Nano-texture)?+
UltraGear 27GP950-B refreshes at 160Hz vs 60Hz.
Which has faster response time, UltraGear 27GP950-B or Studio Display (Nano-texture)?+
UltraGear 27GP950-B responds in 1ms vs 8ms.
Does UltraGear 27GP950-B or Studio Display (Nano-texture) have USB-C with power delivery?+
Studio Display (Nano-texture) offers USB-C with 96W power delivery.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.