Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro vs Vivo - X200 Pro
Between the Phone (3a) Pro and X200 Pro, the Phone (3a) Pro comes out ahead in front camera and weight, while the X200 Pro wins on antutu and wired charging. Overall, the Phone (3a) Pro scores 63.8 and the X200 Pro scores 74 on our Mars Score.
Qual você deve comprar?
The X200 Pro is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 10.2 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Phone (3a) Pro if you photograph or shoot video regularly and want the better imaging pipeline of the two. The biggest gaps in its favor are front camera, weight.
Pick the X200 Pro if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are antutu, wired charging, ram, among others.
Both ship with comparable main camera, refresh rate, 5g support, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X200 Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Por que o Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro vence
- ▲Front camera — 56.25% more. 50 MP vs 32 MP.
- ▲Weight — 12.00 g less. 211 vs 223.
Por que o Vivo - X200 Pro vence
- ▲AnTuTu — 222.35% more. 2740000 vs 850000.
- ▲Wired charging — 80.00% more. 90 W vs 50 W.
- ▲RAM — 33.33% more. 16 GB vs 12 GB.
- ▲Battery capacity — 20.00% more. 6000 mAh vs 5000 mAh.
- ▲Pixel density — 16.80% more. 452 ppi vs 387 ppi.
- ▲Water resistance: IP69 (vs IP64).
- ▲Promised OS updates: 4 (vs 3).
- ▲Screen size — 0.15% more. 6.78 " vs 6.77 ".
Comparação de specs
Design
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 211 glead | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mmlead | 8.5 mm |
| Water resistanceⓘ | IP64 | IP69lead |
| Form factor | bar | bar |
Display
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 6.77 " | 6.78 "lead |
| Pixel densityⓘ | 387 ppi | 452 ppilead |
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 3000 nits | 4500 nitslead |
Performance
Cameras
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main cameraⓘ | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 50 MPlead | 32 MP |
| Optical image stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Battery
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAhlead |
| Wired chargingⓘ | 50 W | 90 Wlead |
| Wireless chargingⓘ | 0 W | 30 Wlead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G supportⓘ | true | true |
| Headphone jack | false | false |
| microSD slot | false | false |
Operating System
| Spec | Nothing - Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo - X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS | Android | Android |
| Promised OS updates | 3 years | 4 yearslead |
Perguntas frequentes
Which has better battery, Phone (3a) Pro or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro has 20.0% more battery — 5000 mAh vs 6000 mAh.
Which is lighter, Phone (3a) Pro or X200 Pro?+
Phone (3a) Pro is 12g lighter — 211g vs 223g.
Is Phone (3a) Pro waterproof?+
Phone (3a) Pro has an IP64 rating.
Does X200 Pro support 5G?+
Yes, X200 Pro supports 5G.
Which has more RAM, Phone (3a) Pro or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro offers 16GB of RAM.
Which has a better camera, Phone (3a) Pro or X200 Pro?+
X200 Pro has a 50 MP main camera vs 50 MP.
Análises por spec
Mais das mesmas marcas
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.