Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

64 Audio - U12t vs Moondrop - Blessing 3

Last updated · How Mars Score works
U12t64 AUDIORENDER
Probe A
64 Audio
U12t
79.3/ 100A
Drivers79· 70%
Build· 30%
Blessing 3MOONDROPRENDER
Probe B
Moondrop
Blessing 3
68.3/ 100B
Drivers68· 70%
Build· 30%
Quick verdict

Between the U12t and Blessing 3, the U12t comes out ahead in driver count and impedance, while the Blessing 3 wins on sensitivity. Overall, the U12t scores 79.3 and the Blessing 3 scores 68.3 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The U12t is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 11.0 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the U12t if you care most about driver count and impedance. The biggest gaps in its favor are driver count, impedance.

Pick the Blessing 3 if you care most about sensitivity. Its strongest claims are sensitivity.

Both ship with comparable detachable cable, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the U12t is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why 64 Audio - U12t wins

  • Driver count — 7.00 more. 12 vs 5.
  • Impedance — 3.00 Ω less. 12 vs 15.

Why Moondrop - Blessing 3 wins

  • Sensitivity — 1.74% more. 117 dB vs 115 dB.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Drivers

Spec64 Audio - U12tMoondrop - Blessing 3
Driver count12lead5
Driver types12 Balanced Armature1DD + 4BA Hybrid
Impedance12 Ωlead15 Ω
Sensitivity115 dB117 dBlead

Build

Spec64 Audio - U12tMoondrop - Blessing 3
Detachable cabletruetrue
Connector2-pin2-pin
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.