Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Apple - M4 Max (16-core) vs Intel - Core i5-14600K

Last updated · How Mars Score works
M4 Max (16-core)APPLEILLUSTRATION
Probe A
Apple
M4 Max (16-core)
50.7/ 100D
Cores48· 40%
Benchmarks54· 40%
Platform· 20%
Core i5-14600KINTELILLUSTRATION
Probe B
Intel
Core i5-14600K
52.1/ 100D
Cores52· 40%
Benchmarks52· 40%
Platform· 20%
The fork

Where they actually differ

The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.

SpecApple - M4 Max (16-core)Intel - Core i5-14600K
TDP45 W125 W
Boost clock4.5 GHz5.3 GHz
L3 cache28 MB24 MB
Cinebench R23 (multi)2650024300
Quick verdict

Between the M4 Max (16-core) and Core i5-14600K, the M4 Max (16-core) comes out ahead in tdp / l3 cache, while the Core i5-14600K wins on boost clock. Overall, the M4 Max (16-core) scores 50.7 and the Core i5-14600K scores 52.1 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (50.7 vs 52.1). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.

Pick the M4 Max (16-core) if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp, l3 cache, cinebench r23 (multi). The single most decisive one: TDP — 80.00 W less. 45 vs 125.

Pick the Core i5-14600K if you care most about boost clock. Its strongest claims are boost clock. The single most decisive one: Boost clock — 17.78% more. 5.3 GHz vs 4.5 GHz.

Both ship with comparable cores, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Decision guide

Which should you buy: Apple - M4 Max (16-core) or Intel - Core i5-14600K?

Intel - Core i5-14600K leads the current Mars Score by 1.4 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare boost clock, tdp against the way you will actually use the product.

Choose Apple - M4 Max (16-core) if…

Apple - M4 Max (16-core) has the measurable edge on tdp w, cache l3 mb, cinebench r23 multi.

Choose Intel - Core i5-14600K if…

Intel - Core i5-14600K has the measurable edge on boost clock ghz.

This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.

Why Apple - M4 Max (16-core) wins

  • TDP — 80.00 W less. 45 vs 125.
  • L3 cache — 16.67% more. 28 MB vs 24 MB.
  • Cinebench R23 (multi) — 9.05% more. 26500 vs 24300.

Why Intel - Core i5-14600K wins

  • Boost clock — 17.78% more. 5.3 GHz vs 4.5 GHz.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Cores

SpecApple - M4 Max (16-core)Intel - Core i5-14600K
Cores1414
Threads1420lead
Base clock0 GHz3.5 GHzlead
Boost clock4.5 GHz5.3 GHzlead
L3 cache28 MBlead24 MB

Platform

SpecApple - M4 Max (16-core)Intel - Core i5-14600K
SocketSolderedLGA1700
TDP45 Wlead125 W
Integrated graphicstruetrue
DDR5truetrue

Benchmarks

SpecApple - M4 Max (16-core)Intel - Core i5-14600K
Cinebench R23 (multi)26500lead24300
Cinebench R23 (single)2275lead2030
Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands