Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Apple - M4 Pro | Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 14 | 10 |
| Cinebench R23 (multi) | 23800 | 18200 |
| TDP | 40 W | 65 W |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 20 MB |
| Boost clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
Between the M4 Pro and Core Ultra 5 225, the M4 Pro comes out ahead in cores / cinebench r23 (multi), while the Core Ultra 5 225 wins on boost clock. Overall, the M4 Pro scores 49.6 and the Core Ultra 5 225 scores 47.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (49.6 vs 47.8). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the M4 Pro if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. The biggest gaps in its favor are cores, cinebench r23 (multi), tdp, among others. The single most decisive one: Cores — 40.00% more. 14 vs 10.
Pick the Core Ultra 5 225 if you care most about boost clock. Its strongest claims are boost clock. The single most decisive one: Boost clock — 8.89% more. 4.9 GHz vs 4.5 GHz.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Apple - M4 Pro or Intel - Core Ultra 5 225?
Apple - M4 Pro leads the current Mars Score by 1.8 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare cores, boost clock, tdp against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Apple - M4 Pro if…
Apple - M4 Pro has the measurable edge on core count, cinebench r23 multi, tdp w.
Choose Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 if…
Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 has the measurable edge on boost clock ghz.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Apple - M4 Pro wins
- ▲Cores — 40.00% more. 14 vs 10.
- ▲Cinebench R23 (multi) — 30.77% more. 23800 vs 18200.
- ▲TDP — 25.00 W less. 40 vs 65.
- ▲L3 cache — 20.00% more. 24 MB vs 20 MB.
Why Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 wins
- ▲Boost clock — 8.89% more. 4.9 GHz vs 4.5 GHz.
Spec comparison
Cores
| Spec | Apple - M4 Pro | Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Coresⓘ | 14lead | 10 |
| Threadsⓘ | 14lead | 10 |
| Base clockⓘ | 0 GHz | 3.3 GHzlead |
| Boost clockⓘ | 4.5 GHz | 4.9 GHzlead |
| L3 cacheⓘ | 24 MBlead | 20 MB |
Platform
| Spec | Apple - M4 Pro | Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Socketⓘ | Soldered | LGA1851 |
| TDPⓘ | 40 Wlead | 65 W |
| Integrated graphicsⓘ | true | true |
| DDR5ⓘ | true | true |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple - M4 Pro | Intel - Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cinebench R23 (multi)ⓘ | 23800lead | 18200 |
| Cinebench R23 (single)ⓘ | 2260lead | 1980 |