Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Apple - M4 Pro | Intel - Core Ultra 5 245K |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40 W | 125 W |
| Boost clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Cinebench R23 (multi) | 23800 | 25400 |
Between the M4 Pro and Core Ultra 5 245K, the M4 Pro comes out ahead in tdp, while the Core Ultra 5 245K wins on boost clock / cinebench r23 (multi). Overall, the M4 Pro scores 49.6 and the Core Ultra 5 245K scores 51.9 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (49.6 vs 51.9). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the M4 Pro if you care most about tdp. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp. The single most decisive one: TDP — 85.00 W less. 40 vs 125.
Pick the Core Ultra 5 245K if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are boost clock, cinebench r23 (multi). The single most decisive one: Boost clock — 15.56% more. 5.2 GHz vs 4.5 GHz.
Both ship with comparable cores, l3 cache, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Apple - M4 Pro or Intel - Core Ultra 5 245K?
Intel - Core Ultra 5 245K leads the current Mars Score by 2.3 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare boost clock, tdp against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Apple - M4 Pro if…
Apple - M4 Pro has the measurable edge on tdp w.
Choose Intel - Core Ultra 5 245K if…
Intel - Core Ultra 5 245K has the measurable edge on boost clock ghz, cinebench r23 multi.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Apple - M4 Pro wins
- ▲TDP — 85.00 W less. 40 vs 125.
Why Intel - Core Ultra 5 245K wins
- ▲Boost clock — 15.56% more. 5.2 GHz vs 4.5 GHz.
- ▲Cinebench R23 (multi) — 6.72% more. 25400 vs 23800.
Spec comparison
Cores
| Spec | Apple - M4 Pro | Intel - Core Ultra 5 245K |
|---|---|---|
| Coresⓘ | 14 | 14 |
| Threadsⓘ | 14 | 14 |
| Base clockⓘ | 0 GHz | 4.2 GHzlead |
| Boost clockⓘ | 4.5 GHz | 5.2 GHzlead |
| L3 cacheⓘ | 24 MB | 24 MB |
Platform
| Spec | Apple - M4 Pro | Intel - Core Ultra 5 245K |
|---|---|---|
| Socketⓘ | Soldered | LGA1851 |
| TDPⓘ | 40 Wlead | 125 W |
| Integrated graphicsⓘ | true | true |
| DDR5ⓘ | true | true |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple - M4 Pro | Intel - Core Ultra 5 245K |
|---|---|---|
| Cinebench R23 (multi)ⓘ | 23800 | 25400lead |
| Cinebench R23 (single)ⓘ | 2260lead | 2080 |