Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Apple - M5 Ultra | Intel - Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125 W | |
| Cores | 36 | 24 |
| Boost clock | 6.0 GHz | |
| L3 cache | 36 MB | |
| Cinebench R23 (multi) | 40400 |
Between the M5 Ultra and Core i9-14900K, the M5 Ultra comes out ahead in tdp / cores, while the Core i9-14900K wins on boost clock / l3 cache. Overall, the M5 Ultra scores 53.5 and the Core i9-14900K scores 61.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Core i9-14900K edges ahead on the Mars Score (53.5 vs 61.1), but the 7.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the M5 Ultra if you care most about tdp / cores. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp, cores. The single most decisive one: TDP — 125.00 W less. vs 125.
Pick the Core i9-14900K if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are boost clock, l3 cache, cinebench r23 (multi). The single most decisive one: Boost clock: 6.0 GHz vs GHz.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the Core i9-14900K is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Which should you buy: Apple - M5 Ultra or Intel - Core i9-14900K?
Intel - Core i9-14900K leads the current Mars Score by 7.6 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare cores, boost clock, tdp against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Apple - M5 Ultra if…
Apple - M5 Ultra has the measurable edge on tdp w, core count.
Choose Intel - Core i9-14900K if…
Intel - Core i9-14900K has the measurable edge on boost clock ghz, cache l3 mb, cinebench r23 multi.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Apple - M5 Ultra wins
- ▲TDP — 125.00 W less. vs 125.
- ▲Cores — 50.00% more. 36 vs 24.
Why Intel - Core i9-14900K wins
- ▲Boost clock: 6.0 GHz vs GHz.
- ▲L3 cache: 36 MB vs MB.
- ▲Cinebench R23 (multi): 40400 vs .
Spec comparison
Cores
| Spec | Apple - M5 Ultra | Intel - Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Coresⓘ | 36lead | 24 |
| Threadsⓘ | 36lead | 32 |
| Base clockⓘ | 3.2 GHzlead | |
| Boost clockⓘ | 6.0 GHzlead | |
| L3 cacheⓘ | 36 MBlead |
Platform
| Spec | Apple - M5 Ultra | Intel - Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Socketⓘ | Soldered | LGA1700 |
| TDPⓘ | lead | 125 W |
| Integrated graphicsⓘ | true | true |
| DDR5ⓘ | true | true |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple - M5 Ultra | Intel - Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Cinebench R23 (multi)ⓘ | 40400lead | |
| Cinebench R23 (single)ⓘ | 2310lead |