Between the Predator X32 X3 and PD3225U, the Predator X32 X3 comes out ahead in refresh rate and peak brightness, while the PD3225U wins on several specs. Overall, the Predator X32 X3 scores 73.2 and the PD3225U scores 63.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Predator X32 X3 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 9.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Predator X32 X3 if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.
The PD3225U similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable usb-c power delivery, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Predator X32 X3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Acer - Predator X32 X3 wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 300.00% more. 240 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Peak brightness — 150.00% more. 1000 nits vs 400 nits.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 1.59% more. 32 " vs 31.5 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Why BenQ - PD3225U wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | BenQ - PD3225U |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 32 "lead | 31.5 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | BenQ - PD3225U |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 60 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1000 nitslead | 400 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| Spec | Acer - Predator X32 X3 | BenQ - PD3225U |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 90 W | 90 W |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, Predator X32 X3 or PD3225U?+
Predator X32 X3 refreshes at 240Hz vs 60Hz.
Which has faster response time, Predator X32 X3 or PD3225U?+
Predator X32 X3 responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does Predator X32 X3 or PD3225U have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on Predator X32 X3, 90W on PD3225U.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.