Between the ROG Swift PG39WCDM and UltraSharp U2725QE, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM comes out ahead in peak brightness and refresh rate, while the UltraSharp U2725QE wins on usb-c power delivery. Overall, the ROG Swift PG39WCDM scores 79.8 and the UltraSharp U2725QE scores 60.3 on our Mars Score.
أيهما يجب أن تشتري؟
The ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 19.5 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the ROG Swift PG39WCDM if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.
Pick the UltraSharp U2725QE if you care most about usb-c power delivery. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the ROG Swift PG39WCDM is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
لماذا يفوز ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM
- ▲Peak brightness — 188.89% more. 1300 nits vs 450 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 44.44% more. 39 " vs 27 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
لماذا يفوز Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 55.56% more. 140 W vs 90 W.
مقارنة المواصفات
Panel
| المواصفة | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 39 "lead | 27 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | QD-OLEDlead | IPS |
| Resolutionⓘ | 1440p | 4Klead |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | truelead | false |
Performance
| المواصفة | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hzlead | 120 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 mslead | 5 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1300 nitslead | 450 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98 % |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | truelead | false |
| FreeSyncⓘ | truelead | false |
Connectivity
| المواصفة | ASUS - ROG Swift PG39WCDM | Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2lead | 1 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 90 W | 140 Wlead |
| KVM | true | true |
الأسئلة الشائعة
Which has higher refresh rate, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or UltraSharp U2725QE?+
ROG Swift PG39WCDM refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, ROG Swift PG39WCDM or UltraSharp U2725QE?+
ROG Swift PG39WCDM responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does ROG Swift PG39WCDM or UltraSharp U2725QE have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 90W on ROG Swift PG39WCDM, 140W on UltraSharp U2725QE.
تحليلات تفصيلية للمواصفات
المزيد من العلامات نفسها
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.