Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024)

Last updated · How Mars Score works
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
70.4/ 100B
Performance52· 35%
Battery & Ports88· 27%
Design· 20%
Display77· 18%
Gram Pro 17 (2024)LGRENDER
Probe B
LG
Gram Pro 17 (2024)
73.5/ 100B
Performance60· 35%
Battery & Ports88· 27%
Design· 20%
Display77· 18%
Quick verdict

Between the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) and Gram Pro 17 (2024), the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) comes out ahead in refresh rate, while the Gram Pro 17 (2024) wins on cpu cores and claimed battery life. Overall, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 70.4 and the Gram Pro 17 (2024) scores 73.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Gram Pro 17 (2024) edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 73.5), but the 3.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate.

Pick the Gram Pro 17 (2024) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are cpu cores, claimed battery life, screen size, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, storage, battery, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.

Why ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins

  • Refresh rate — 14.58% more. 165 Hz vs 144 Hz.

Why LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024) wins

  • CPU cores — 100.00% more. 16 vs 8.
  • Claimed battery life — 80.00% more. 18 h vs 10 h.
  • Screen size — 6.25% more. 17 " vs 16 ".
  • Thunderbolt ports — 2.00 more. 2 vs 0.
  • Weight — 0.71 kg less. 1.49 vs 2.2.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024)
Weight2.2 kg1.49 kglead
Thickness26.9 mm12.4 mmlead
Build materialplasticmagnesium
Backlit keyboardtruetrue
Fingerprint readerfalsetruelead

Display

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024)
Screen size16 "17 "lead
Refresh rate165 Hzlead144 Hz
Panel typeIPSIPS

Performance

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024)
CPUAMD Ryzen 9 8945HSIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
CPU cores816lead
GPUAMD Radeon RX 7700SNVIDIA RTX 3050 Laptop
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage1024 GB1024 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD

Battery & Ports

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)LG - Gram Pro 17 (2024)
Battery90 Wh90 Wh
Claimed battery life10 h18 hlead
USB-C ports2lead1
Thunderbolt ports02lead
HDMItruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery life, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Gram Pro 17 (2024)?+

Gram Pro 17 (2024) claims up to 18 hours — 10h vs 18h.

Which is lighter, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Gram Pro 17 (2024)?+

Gram Pro 17 (2024) is lighter at 1.49 kg vs 2.2 kg.

Which has an OLED display, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Gram Pro 17 (2024)?+

Neither model has an OLED display.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.