Between the AT2020USB+ and PodMic USB, the AT2020USB+ comes out ahead in max spl and type, while the PodMic USB wins on connection. Overall, the AT2020USB+ scores 73.9 and the PodMic USB scores 68.3 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The AT2020USB+ edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.9 vs 68.3), but the 5.6-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the AT2020USB+ if you care most about max spl and type. The biggest gaps in its favor are max spl, type.
Pick the PodMic USB if you care most about connection. Its strongest claims are connection.
Both ship with comparable polar pattern, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the AT2020USB+ is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Audio-Technica - AT2020USB+ wins
- ▲Max SPL — 2.86% more. 144 dB vs 140 dB.
- ▲Type: Condenser (vs Dynamic).
Why Rode - PodMic USB wins
- ▲Connection: XLR + USB (vs USB).
Spec comparison
Spec
| Spec | Audio-Technica - AT2020USB+ | Rode - PodMic USB |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Condenserlead | Dynamic |
| Polar pattern | Cardioid | Cardioid |
| Frequency response | 20Hz–20kHz | 20Hz–20kHz |
| Max SPL | 144 dBlead | 140 dB |
Connectivity
| Spec | Audio-Technica - AT2020USB+ | Rode - PodMic USB |
|---|---|---|
| Connection | USB | XLR + USBlead |
| Headphone out | true | true |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.