Between the SER9 HX 370 and Mac mini M4, the SER9 HX 370 comes out ahead in storage and ram, while the Mac mini M4 wins on thunderbolt and volume. Overall, the SER9 HX 370 scores 70.4 and the Mac mini M4 scores 64.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The SER9 HX 370 edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 64.1), but the 6.3-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the SER9 HX 370 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. The biggest gaps in its favor are storage, ram.
Pick the Mac mini M4 if you care most about thunderbolt and volume. Its strongest claims are thunderbolt, volume.
Both ship with comparable tdp, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the SER9 HX 370 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Beelink - SER9 HX 370 wins
- ▲Storage — 300.00% more. 1024 GB vs 256 GB.
- ▲RAM — 100.00% more. 32 GB vs 16 GB.
Why Apple - Mac mini M4 wins
- ▲Has Thunderbolt.
- ▲Volume — 0.56 L less. 0.34 vs 0.9.
Spec comparison
Core
Form & I/O
| Spec | Beelink - SER9 HX 370 | Apple - Mac mini M4 |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 0.9 L | 0.34 Llead |
| Weight | 0.85 kg | 0.67 kglead |
| TDPⓘ | 65 W | 65 W |
| USB ports | 6lead | 5 |
| Thunderboltⓘ | false | truelead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.