Between the W5800 and PX3-Pro, the W5800 comes out ahead in several specs, while the PX3-Pro wins on brightness and short-throw. Overall, the W5800 scores 73.9 and the PX3-Pro scores 80.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The PX3-Pro edges ahead on the Mars Score (73.9 vs 80.1), but the 6.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
The W5800 doesn't pull ahead on any single popular-comparison spec — its strengths sit in the spec table groups rather than the headline advantages.
Pick the PX3-Pro if you care most about brightness and short-throw. Its strongest claims are brightness, short-throw.
Both ship with comparable resolution, light source, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the PX3-Pro is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why BenQ - W5800 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Why Hisense - PX3-Pro wins
- ▲Brightness — 15.38% more. 3000 lm vs 2600 lm.
- ▲Short-throw: true (vs false).
Spec comparison
Image
| Spec | BenQ - W5800 | Hisense - PX3-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Brightness | 2600 lm | 3000 lmlead |
| Contrast | 2000000:1 | 3000:1 |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Short-throw | false | truelead |
Smart & Connectivity
| Spec | BenQ - W5800 | Hisense - PX3-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Smart OS | None | Google TV |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 3lead |
| Built-in speakers | false | truelead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.