Bissell - Pet Hair Eraser 2390 vs Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H
Between the Pet Hair Eraser 2390 and Cordless Pro IZ862H, the Pet Hair Eraser 2390 comes out ahead in dustbin, while the Cordless Pro IZ862H wins on suction (aw) and weight. Overall, the Pet Hair Eraser 2390 scores 64.6 and the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 70.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Cordless Pro IZ862H edges ahead on the Mars Score (64.6 vs 70.7), but the 6.1-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Pet Hair Eraser 2390 if you care most about dustbin. The biggest gaps in its favor are dustbin.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are suction (aw), weight, cordless, among others.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the Cordless Pro IZ862H is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Bissell - Pet Hair Eraser 2390 wins
- ▲Dustbin — 42.86% more. 1.0 L vs 0.7 L.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 16.67% more. 175 vs 150.
- ▲Weight — 4.50 kg less. 3.5 vs 8.0.
- ▲Cordless: true (vs false).
- ▲Battery: 60 min vs 0 min.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Bissell - Pet Hair Eraser 2390 | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 150 | 175lead |
| Dustbin | 1.0 Llead | 0.7 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Bissell - Pet Hair Eraser 2390 | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Corded uprightlead | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | false | truelead |
| Weight | 8.0 kg | 3.5 kglead |
| Battery | 0 min | 60 minlead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.