Between the MFC-L8905CDW and EcoTank ET-5850, the MFC-L8905CDW comes out ahead in pages/min (color) and pages/min (mono), while the EcoTank ET-5850 wins on several specs. Overall, the MFC-L8905CDW scores 68.8 and the EcoTank ET-5850 scores 60.4 on our Mars Score.
أيهما يجب أن تشتري؟
The MFC-L8905CDW is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the MFC-L8905CDW if you care most about pages/min (color) and pages/min (mono). The biggest gaps in its favor are pages/min (color), pages/min (mono).
The EcoTank ET-5850 similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable color, auto duplex, adf, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the MFC-L8905CDW is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
لماذا يفوز Brother - MFC-L8905CDW
- ▲Pages/min (color) — 175.00% more. 33 vs 12.
- ▲Pages/min (mono) — 32.00% more. 33 vs 25.
لماذا يفوز Epson - EcoTank ET-5850
- No decisive advantages.
مقارنة المواصفات
Spec
| المواصفة | Brother - MFC-L8905CDW | Epson - EcoTank ET-5850 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Laser AIO (color) | Inkjet AIO |
| Color | true | true |
| Pages/min (mono) | 33lead | 25 |
| Pages/min (color) | 33lead | 12 |
| Resolution | 2400x600 dpi | 4800x1200 dpi |
| Max paper size | Letter | Letter |
Features
| المواصفة | Brother - MFC-L8905CDW | Epson - EcoTank ET-5850 |
|---|---|---|
| Auto duplex | true | true |
| ADF | true | true |
| Wi-Fi | true | true |
| AirPrint | true | true |
تحليلات تفصيلية للمواصفات
المزيد من العلامات نفسها
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.