Between the EOS R1 and α7C II, the EOS R1 comes out ahead in af points and max video, while the α7C II wins on weight and megapixels. Overall, the EOS R1 scores 46 and the α7C II scores 52.8 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The α7C II edges ahead on the Mars Score (46 vs 52.8), but the 6.8-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the EOS R1 if you care most about af points and max video. The biggest gaps in its favor are af points, max video.
Pick the α7C II if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are weight, megapixels.
Both ship with comparable sensor size, in-body stabilization, log profile, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the α7C II is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Canon - EOS R1 wins
- ▲AF points — 38.74% more. 1053 vs 759.
- ▲Max video: 6K (vs 4K60).
Why Sony - α7C II wins
- ▲Weight — 601.00 g less. 514 vs 1115.
- ▲Megapixels — 37.50% more. 33 MP vs 24 MP.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Canon - EOS R1 | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor sizeⓘ | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Megapixels | 24 MP | 33 MPlead |
| Max ISO | 204800lead | 51200 |
Video
| Spec | Canon - EOS R1 | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 6Klead | 4K60 |
| RAW video | truelead | false |
| Log profileⓘ | true | true |
Autofocus
| Spec | Canon - EOS R1 | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| AF pointsⓘ | 1053lead | 759 |
| Eye AFⓘ | true | true |
| In-body stabilizationⓘ | true | true |
Body & Controls
| Spec | Canon - EOS R1 | Sony - α7C II |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1115 g | 514 glead |
| Weather sealedⓘ | true | true |
| Dual card slotsⓘ | truelead | false |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.