Between the EOS R5 C and FX30, the EOS R5 C comes out ahead in xlr input and max video, while the FX30 wins on several specs. Overall, the EOS R5 C scores 35 and the FX30 scores 35 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are evenly matched on the broad strokes, with the decision sitting on which individual spec advantages weigh more for your use.
Pick the EOS R5 C if you care most about xlr input and max video. The biggest gaps in its favor are xlr input, max video, sensor size.
The FX30 similarly doesn't carry a headline advantage on the popular specs — look at the full table for category-specific deltas.
Both ship with comparable optical zoom, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Canon - EOS R5 C wins
- ▲Has XLR input.
- ▲Max video: 8K (vs 4K120).
- ▲Sensor size: Full Frame (vs APS-C).
Why Sony - FX30 wins
- No decisive advantages.
Spec comparison
Video
| Spec | Canon - EOS R5 C | Sony - FX30 |
|---|---|---|
| Max video | 8Klead | 4K120 |
| Optical zoom | 0 | 0 |
| Sensor sizeⓘ | Full Framelead | APS-C |
Audio
| Spec | Canon - EOS R5 C | Sony - FX30 |
|---|---|---|
| XLR input | truelead | false |
| Headphone jack | true | true |
Design
| Spec | Canon - EOS R5 C | Sony - FX30 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 770 g | 646 glead |
| Articulating screen | true | true |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.