Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE vs Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P
Between the UltraSharp U2725QE and AORUS FO32U2P, the UltraSharp U2725QE comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery, while the AORUS FO32U2P wins on peak brightness and refresh rate. Overall, the UltraSharp U2725QE scores 60.3 and the AORUS FO32U2P scores 73.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The AORUS FO32U2P is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.9 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the UltraSharp U2725QE if you care most about usb-c power delivery. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery.
Pick the AORUS FO32U2P if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are peak brightness, refresh rate, response time (gtg), among others.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the AORUS FO32U2P is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 115.38% more. 140 W vs 65 W.
Why Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 122.22% more. 1000 nits vs 450 nits.
- ▲Refresh rate — 100.00% more. 240 Hz vs 120 Hz.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.40% less. 0.03 ms vs 5 ms.
- ▲Screen size — 18.52% more. 32 " vs 27 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 1.02% more. 99 % vs 98 %.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs IPS).
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 27 " | 32 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 120 Hz | 240 Hzlead |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 5 ms | 0.03 mslead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 450 nits | 1000 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 98 % | 99 %lead |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | truelead |
| FreeSyncⓘ | false | truelead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Dell - UltraSharp U2725QE | Gigabyte - AORUS FO32U2P |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 1 | 2lead |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 2lead |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 140 Wlead | 65 W |
| KVM | true | true |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, UltraSharp U2725QE or AORUS FO32U2P?+
AORUS FO32U2P refreshes at 240Hz vs 120Hz.
Which has faster response time, UltraSharp U2725QE or AORUS FO32U2P?+
AORUS FO32U2P responds in 0.03ms vs 5ms.
Does UltraSharp U2725QE or AORUS FO32U2P have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 140W on UltraSharp U2725QE, 65W on AORUS FO32U2P.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.