Between the V8 (2024) and Cordless Pro IZ862H, the V8 (2024) comes out ahead in weight, while the Cordless Pro IZ862H wins on suction (aw) and battery. Overall, the V8 (2024) scores 55.5 and the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 70.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Cordless Pro IZ862H is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 15.2 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the V8 (2024) if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are weight.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you care most about suction (aw) and battery. Its strongest claims are suction (aw), battery, dustbin.
Both ship with comparable cordless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Cordless Pro IZ862H is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Dyson - V8 (2024) wins
- ▲Weight — 0.95 kg less. 2.55 vs 3.5.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 52.17% more. 175 vs 115.
- ▲Battery — 50.00% more. 60 min vs 40 min.
- ▲Dustbin — 29.63% more. 0.7 L vs 0.54 L.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Dyson - V8 (2024) | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 115 | 175lead |
| Dustbin | 0.54 L | 0.7 Llead |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Dyson - V8 (2024) | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 2.55 kglead | 3.5 kg |
| Battery | 40 min | 60 minlead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.