Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Etymotic - ER4XR vs Hifiman - Svanar

Last updated · How Mars Score works
ER4XRETYMOTICRENDER
Probe A
Etymotic
ER4XR
39.7/ 100D
Drivers40· 70%
Build· 30%
SvanarHIFIMANRENDER
Probe B
Hifiman
Svanar
50.3/ 100D
Drivers50· 70%
Build· 30%
Quick verdict

Between the ER4XR and Svanar, the ER4XR comes out ahead in impedance, while the Svanar wins on sensitivity. Overall, the ER4XR scores 39.7 and the Svanar scores 50.3 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The Svanar is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 10.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the ER4XR if you care most about impedance. The biggest gaps in its favor are impedance.

Pick the Svanar if you care most about sensitivity. Its strongest claims are sensitivity.

Both ship with comparable driver count, detachable cable, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the Svanar is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Etymotic - ER4XR wins

  • Impedance — 15.00 Ω less. 45 vs 60.

Why Hifiman - Svanar wins

  • Sensitivity — 9.18% more. 107 dB vs 98 dB.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Drivers

SpecEtymotic - ER4XRHifiman - Svanar
Driver count11
Driver typesBalanced ArmatureDynamic (Topology Diaphragm)
Impedance45 Ωlead60 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB107 dBlead

Build

SpecEtymotic - ER4XRHifiman - Svanar
Detachable cabletruetrue
ConnectorMMCX0.78mm 2-pinlead
Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.