Between the ULX and X2V2 Mini, the ULX comes out ahead in battery and weight, while the X2V2 Mini wins on polling rate. Overall, the ULX scores 81.5 and the X2V2 Mini scores 86.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The X2V2 Mini edges ahead on the Mars Score (81.5 vs 86.7), but the 5.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the ULX if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery, weight.
Pick the X2V2 Mini if you care most about polling rate. Its strongest claims are polling rate.
Both ship with comparable max dpi, wireless, buttons, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the X2V2 Mini is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Finalmouse - ULX wins
- ▲Battery — 42.86% more. 100 h vs 70 h.
- ▲Weight — 13.00 g less. 39 vs 52.
Why Pulsar - X2V2 Mini wins
- ▲Polling rate — 100.00% more. 8000 Hz vs 4000 Hz.
Spec comparison
Sensor
| Spec | Finalmouse - ULX | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Max DPI | 26000 | 26000 |
| Max IPS | 650 | 650 |
| Polling rate | 4000 Hz | 8000 Hzlead |
Design
| Spec | Finalmouse - ULX | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 39 glead | 52 g |
| Buttons | 6 | 6 |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Symmetrical |
Connectivity
| Spec | Finalmouse - ULX | Pulsar - X2V2 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless | true | true |
| Battery | 100 hlead | 70 h |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.