LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) vs MSI - MPG 321URX
Between the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) and MPG 321URX, the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) comes out ahead in peak brightness, while the MPG 321URX wins on usb-c power delivery and screen size. Overall, the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) scores 72.5 and the MPG 321URX scores 73.2 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (72.5 vs 73.2). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are peak brightness.
Pick the MPG 321URX if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are usb-c power delivery, screen size, dci-p3 coverage, among others.
Both ship with comparable refresh rate, response time (gtg), g-sync, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) wins
- ▲Peak brightness — 30.00% more. 1300 nits vs 1000 nits.
Why MSI - MPG 321URX wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 50.77% more. 98 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Screen size — 1.59% more. 32 " vs 31.5 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
- ▲Panel type: QD-OLED (vs OLED).
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 31.5 " | 32 "lead |
| Panel typeⓘ | OLED | QD-OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 4K | 4K |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 0.03 ms | 0.03 ms |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 1300 nitslead | 1000 nits |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 98.5 % | 99 %lead |
| HDRⓘ | true | true |
| G-Syncⓘ | true | true |
| FreeSyncⓘ | true | true |
Connectivity
| Spec | LG - UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) | MSI - MPG 321URX |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort ports | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 65 W | 98 Wlead |
| KVM | false | truelead |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MPG 321URX?+
MPG 321URX refreshes at 240Hz vs 240Hz.
Which has faster response time, UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MPG 321URX?+
MPG 321URX responds in 0.03ms vs 0.03ms.
Does UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode) or MPG 321URX have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 65W on UltraGear 32GS95UE-B (Dual Mode), 98W on MPG 321URX.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.