RingConn - Gen 2 Smart Ring vs Samsung - Galaxy Fit 3
Between the Gen 2 Smart Ring and Galaxy Fit 3, the Gen 2 Smart Ring comes out ahead in water resistance, while the Galaxy Fit 3 wins on sport modes and battery life. Overall, the Gen 2 Smart Ring scores 57.2 and the Galaxy Fit 3 scores 63.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Galaxy Fit 3 edges ahead on the Mars Score (57.2 vs 63.4), but the 6.2-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the Gen 2 Smart Ring if you care most about water resistance. The biggest gaps in its favor are water resistance.
Pick the Galaxy Fit 3 if you care most about sport modes and battery life. Its strongest claims are sport modes, battery life.
Both ship with comparable gps, spo2, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Galaxy Fit 3 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why RingConn - Gen 2 Smart Ring wins
- ▲Water resistance — 5.00 ATM more. 10 vs 5.
Why Samsung - Galaxy Fit 3 wins
- ▲Sport modes — 90.00 more. 100 vs 10.
- ▲Battery life — 30.00% more. 13 days vs 10 days.
Spec comparison
Fitness
| Spec | RingConn - Gen 2 Smart Ring | Samsung - Galaxy Fit 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPS | false | false |
| Heart rate | true | true |
| SpO2 | true | true |
| Sleep tracking | true | true |
| Sport modes | 10 | 100lead |
Battery
| Spec | RingConn - Gen 2 Smart Ring | Samsung - Galaxy Fit 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 10 days | 13 dayslead |
| Water resistanceⓘ | 10 ATMlead | 5 ATM |
Design
| Spec | RingConn - Gen 2 Smart Ring | Samsung - Galaxy Fit 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Display size | 0 " | 1.6 "lead |
| Weight | 2.5 glead | 18.5 g |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.