Roborock - Flexi Pro Wet/Dry vs Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H
Between the Flexi Pro Wet/Dry and Cordless Pro IZ862H, the Flexi Pro Wet/Dry comes out ahead in dustbin, while the Cordless Pro IZ862H wins on battery and suction (aw). Overall, the Flexi Pro Wet/Dry scores 69.5 and the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 70.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (69.5 vs 70.7). The decision isn't about overall quality — both clear the bar — it's about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the Flexi Pro Wet/Dry if you care most about dustbin. The biggest gaps in its favor are dustbin.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are battery, suction (aw), weight.
Both ship with comparable cordless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Roborock - Flexi Pro Wet/Dry wins
- ▲Dustbin — 21.43% more. 0.85 L vs 0.7 L.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Battery — 50.00% more. 60 min vs 40 min.
- ▲Suction (AW) — 2.94% more. 175 vs 170.
- ▲Weight — 1.00 kg less. 3.5 vs 4.5.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Roborock - Flexi Pro Wet/Dry | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 170 | 175lead |
| Dustbin | 0.85 Llead | 0.7 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Roborock - Flexi Pro Wet/Dry | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Wet/dry cordlesslead | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 4.5 kg | 3.5 kglead |
| Battery | 40 min | 60 minlead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.