Roborock - H7 Cordless vs Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H
Between the H7 Cordless and Cordless Pro IZ862H, the H7 Cordless comes out ahead in battery and weight, while the Cordless Pro IZ862H wins on dustbin and suction (aw). Overall, the H7 Cordless scores 67 and the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 70.7 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Cordless Pro IZ862H edges ahead on the Mars Score (67 vs 70.7), but the 3.7-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the H7 Cordless if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. The biggest gaps in its favor are battery, weight.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you care most about dustbin and suction (aw). Its strongest claims are dustbin, suction (aw).
Both ship with comparable cordless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Roborock - H7 Cordless wins
- ▲Battery — 50.00% more. 90 min vs 60 min.
- ▲Weight — 2.10 kg less. 1.4 vs 3.5.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Dustbin — 40.00% more. 0.7 L vs 0.5 L.
- ▲Suction (AW) — 9.38% more. 175 vs 160.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Roborock - H7 Cordless | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 160 | 175lead |
| Dustbin | 0.5 L | 0.7 Llead |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Roborock - H7 Cordless | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 1.4 kglead | 3.5 kg |
| Battery | 90 minlead | 60 min |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.