Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H vs Tineco - Pure One Station 5
Between the Cordless Pro IZ862H and Pure One Station 5, the Cordless Pro IZ862H comes out ahead in dustbin, while the Pure One Station 5 wins on suction (aw) and battery. Overall, the Cordless Pro IZ862H scores 70.7 and the Pure One Station 5 scores 79.1 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The Pure One Station 5 is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Cordless Pro IZ862H if you care most about dustbin. The biggest gaps in its favor are dustbin.
Pick the Pure One Station 5 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are suction (aw), battery, weight.
Both ship with comparable cordless, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: the Pure One Station 5 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H wins
- ▲Dustbin — 16.67% more. 0.7 L vs 0.6 L.
Why Tineco - Pure One Station 5 wins
- ▲Suction (AW) — 20.00% more. 210 vs 175.
- ▲Battery — 16.67% more. 70 min vs 60 min.
- ▲Weight — 0.65 kg less. 2.85 vs 3.5.
Spec comparison
Performance
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Tineco - Pure One Station 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction (AW) | 175 | 210lead |
| Dustbin | 0.7 Llead | 0.6 L |
| Filter | HEPA | HEPA |
Design
| Spec | Shark - Cordless Pro IZ862H | Tineco - Pure One Station 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Cordless stick | Cordless stick |
| Cordless | true | true |
| Weight | 3.5 kg | 2.85 kglead |
| Battery | 60 min | 70 minlead |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.