Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) vs LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B
Between the Studio Display (Nano-texture) and UltraGear 27GX790A-B, the Studio Display (Nano-texture) comes out ahead in usb-c power delivery and screen size, while the UltraGear 27GX790A-B wins on refresh rate and peak brightness. Overall, the Studio Display (Nano-texture) scores 56.1 and the UltraGear 27GX790A-B scores 72.6 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The UltraGear 27GX790A-B is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 16.5 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.
Pick the Studio Display (Nano-texture) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are usb-c power delivery, screen size, dci-p3 coverage.
Pick the UltraGear 27GX790A-B if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. Its strongest claims are refresh rate, peak brightness, response time (gtg), among others.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: the UltraGear 27GX790A-B is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.
Why Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) wins
- ▲USB-C Power Delivery — 47.69% more. 96 W vs 65 W.
- ▲Screen size — 1.89% more. 27 " vs 26.5 ".
- ▲DCI-P3 coverage — 0.51% more. 99 % vs 98.5 %.
Why LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B wins
- ▲Refresh rate — 700.00% more. 480 Hz vs 60 Hz.
- ▲Peak brightness — 116.67% more. 1300 nits vs 600 nits.
- ▲Response time (GtG) — 99.63% less. 0.03 ms vs 8 ms.
- ▲Has G-Sync.
- ▲Has FreeSync.
- ▲Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Spec comparison
Panel
| Spec | Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) | LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B |
|---|---|---|
| Screen sizeⓘ | 27 "lead | 26.5 " |
| Panel typeⓘ | IPS | OLEDlead |
| Resolutionⓘ | 5Klead | 1440p |
| Aspect ratioⓘ | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curvedⓘ | false | false |
Performance
| Spec | Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) | LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh rateⓘ | 60 Hz | 480 Hzlead |
| Response time (GtG)ⓘ | 8 ms | 0.03 mslead |
| Peak brightnessⓘ | 600 nits | 1300 nitslead |
| DCI-P3 coverageⓘ | 99 %lead | 98.5 % |
| HDRⓘ | false | truelead |
| G-Syncⓘ | false | truelead |
| FreeSyncⓘ | false | truelead |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple - Studio Display (Nano-texture) | LG - UltraGear 27GX790A-B |
|---|---|---|
| HDMI ports | 0 | 2lead |
| DisplayPort ports | 0 | 1lead |
| USB-C input | true | true |
| USB-C Power Deliveryⓘ | 96 Wlead | 65 W |
| KVM | false | false |
Frequently asked
Which has higher refresh rate, Studio Display (Nano-texture) or UltraGear 27GX790A-B?+
UltraGear 27GX790A-B refreshes at 480Hz vs 60Hz.
Which has faster response time, Studio Display (Nano-texture) or UltraGear 27GX790A-B?+
UltraGear 27GX790A-B responds in 0.03ms vs 8ms.
Does Studio Display (Nano-texture) or UltraGear 27GX790A-B have USB-C with power delivery?+
Both offer USB-C PD — 96W on Studio Display (Nano-texture), 65W on UltraGear 27GX790A-B.
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.