Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs Samsung - Galaxy Book 5 Pro

Last updated · How Mars Score works
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
70.4/ 100B
Performance52· 35%
Battery & Ports88· 27%
Design· 20%
Display77· 18%
Galaxy Book 5 ProSAMSUNGRENDER
Probe B
Samsung
Galaxy Book 5 Pro
58.3/ 100C
Performance50· 35%
Battery & Ports67· 27%
Design· 20%
Display61· 18%
Quick verdict

Between the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) and Galaxy Book 5 Pro, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) comes out ahead in storage / battery, while the Galaxy Book 5 Pro wins on claimed battery life / thunderbolt ports. Overall, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 70.4 and the Galaxy Book 5 Pro scores 58.3 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The TUF Gaming A16 (2024) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 12.1 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are storage, battery, refresh rate, among others.

Pick the Galaxy Book 5 Pro if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are claimed battery life, thunderbolt ports, weight, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, cpu cores, backlit keyboard, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins

  • Storage — 100.00% more. 1024 GB vs 512 GB.
  • Battery — 42.86% more. 90 Wh vs 63 Wh.
  • Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Screen size — 14.29% more. 16 " vs 14 ".

Why Samsung - Galaxy Book 5 Pro wins

  • Claimed battery life — 110.00% more. 21 h vs 10 h.
  • Thunderbolt ports — 2.00 more. 2 vs 0.
  • Weight — 0.97 kg less. 1.23 vs 2.2.
  • Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Samsung - Galaxy Book 5 Pro
Weight2.2 kg1.23 kglead
Thickness26.9 mm11.6 mmlead
Build materialplasticaluminum
Backlit keyboardtruetrue
Fingerprint readerfalsetruelead

Display

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Samsung - Galaxy Book 5 Pro
Screen size16 "lead14 "
Refresh rate165 Hzlead120 Hz
Panel typeIPSOLEDlead

Performance

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Samsung - Galaxy Book 5 Pro
CPUAMD Ryzen 9 8945HSIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
CPU cores88
GPUAMD Radeon RX 7700SIntel Arc 140V
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage1024 GBlead512 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD

Battery & Ports

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Samsung - Galaxy Book 5 Pro
Battery90 Whlead63 Wh
Claimed battery life10 h21 hlead
USB-C ports2lead1
Thunderbolt ports02lead
HDMItruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery life, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Galaxy Book 5 Pro?+

Galaxy Book 5 Pro claims up to 21 hours — 10h vs 21h.

Which is lighter, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Galaxy Book 5 Pro?+

Galaxy Book 5 Pro is lighter at 1.23 kg vs 2.2 kg.

Which has an OLED display, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Galaxy Book 5 Pro?+

Galaxy Book 5 Pro has an OLED display; TUF Gaming A16 (2024) uses IPS.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.