Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs HP - OmniBook Ultra 14

Last updated · How Mars Score works
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
70.4/ 100B
Performance52· 35%
Battery & Ports88· 27%
Design· 20%
Display77· 18%
OmniBook Ultra 14HPRENDER
Probe B
HP
OmniBook Ultra 14
62.5/ 100C
Performance61· 35%
Battery & Ports71· 27%
Design· 20%
Display51· 18%
Quick verdict

Between the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) and OmniBook Ultra 14, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) comes out ahead in refresh rate / battery, while the OmniBook Ultra 14 wins on claimed battery life / ram. Overall, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 70.4 and the OmniBook Ultra 14 scores 62.5 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The TUF Gaming A16 (2024) edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 62.5), but the 7.9-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate, battery, screen size.

Pick the OmniBook Ultra 14 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are claimed battery life, ram, cpu cores, among others.

Both ship with comparable storage, panel type, thunderbolt ports, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins

  • Refresh rate — 175.00% more. 165 Hz vs 60 Hz.
  • Battery — 32.35% more. 90 Wh vs 68 Wh.
  • Screen size — 14.29% more. 16 " vs 14 ".

Why HP - OmniBook Ultra 14 wins

  • Claimed battery life — 110.00% more. 21 h vs 10 h.
  • RAM — 100.00% more. 32 GB vs 16 GB.
  • CPU cores — 50.00% more. 12 vs 8.
  • Weight — 0.70 kg less. 1.5 vs 2.2.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)HP - OmniBook Ultra 14
Weight2.2 kg1.5 kglead
Thickness26.9 mm17 mmlead
Build materialplasticaluminum
Backlit keyboardtruetrue
Fingerprint readerfalsetruelead

Display

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)HP - OmniBook Ultra 14
Screen size16 "lead14 "
Refresh rate165 Hzlead60 Hz
Panel typeIPSIPS

Performance

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)HP - OmniBook Ultra 14
CPUAMD Ryzen 9 8945HSAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
CPU cores812lead
GPUAMD Radeon RX 7700SAMD Radeon 890M
RAM16 GB32 GBlead
Storage1024 GB1024 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD

Battery & Ports

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)HP - OmniBook Ultra 14
Battery90 Whlead68 Wh
Claimed battery life10 h21 hlead
USB-C ports22
Thunderbolt ports00
HDMItrueleadfalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery life, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or OmniBook Ultra 14?+

OmniBook Ultra 14 claims up to 21 hours — 10h vs 21h.

Which is lighter, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or OmniBook Ultra 14?+

OmniBook Ultra 14 is lighter at 1.5 kg vs 2.2 kg.

Which has more RAM, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or OmniBook Ultra 14?+

OmniBook Ultra 14 offers 32GB of RAM.

Which has an OLED display, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or OmniBook Ultra 14?+

Neither model has an OLED display.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.