Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs HP - Pavilion Plus 14

Last updated · How Mars Score works
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
70.4/ 100B
Performance52· 35%
Battery & Ports88· 27%
Design· 20%
Display77· 18%
Pavilion Plus 14HPRENDER
Probe B
HP
Pavilion Plus 14
56.0/ 100D
Performance55· 35%
Battery & Ports57· 27%
Design· 20%
Display56· 18%
Quick verdict

Between the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) and Pavilion Plus 14, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) comes out ahead in storage / refresh rate, while the Pavilion Plus 14 wins on cpu cores / thunderbolt ports. Overall, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 70.4 and the Pavilion Plus 14 scores 56 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The TUF Gaming A16 (2024) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 14.4 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are storage, refresh rate, battery, among others.

Pick the Pavilion Plus 14 if you carry the device everywhere and weight or thickness has been the deciding factor before. Its strongest claims are cpu cores, thunderbolt ports, weight, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, claimed battery life, backlit keyboard, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins

  • Storage — 100.00% more. 1024 GB vs 512 GB.
  • Refresh rate — 83.33% more. 165 Hz vs 90 Hz.
  • Battery — 76.47% more. 90 Wh vs 51 Wh.
  • Screen size — 14.29% more. 16 " vs 14 ".

Why HP - Pavilion Plus 14 wins

  • CPU cores — 75.00% more. 14 vs 8.
  • Thunderbolt ports — 1.00 more. 1 vs 0.
  • Weight — 0.81 kg less. 1.39 vs 2.2.
  • Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)HP - Pavilion Plus 14
Weight2.2 kg1.39 kglead
Thickness26.9 mm18.5 mmlead
Build materialplasticaluminum
Backlit keyboardtruetrue
Fingerprint readerfalsefalse

Display

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)HP - Pavilion Plus 14
Screen size16 "lead14 "
Refresh rate165 Hzlead90 Hz
Panel typeIPSOLEDlead

Performance

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)HP - Pavilion Plus 14
CPUAMD Ryzen 9 8945HSIntel Core Ultra 5 125H
CPU cores814lead
GPUAMD Radeon RX 7700SIntel Arc Graphics
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage1024 GBlead512 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD

Battery & Ports

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)HP - Pavilion Plus 14
Battery90 Whlead51 Wh
Claimed battery life10 h10 h
USB-C ports2lead1
Thunderbolt ports01lead
HDMItruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery life, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Pavilion Plus 14?+

Pavilion Plus 14 claims up to 10 hours — 10h vs 10h.

Which is lighter, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Pavilion Plus 14?+

Pavilion Plus 14 is lighter at 1.39 kg vs 2.2 kg.

Which has an OLED display, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or Pavilion Plus 14?+

Pavilion Plus 14 has an OLED display; TUF Gaming A16 (2024) uses IPS.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.