Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs Apple - MacBook Pro 14 M5

Last updated · How Mars Score works
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
70.4/ 100B
Performance52· 35%
Battery & Ports88· 27%
Design· 20%
Display77· 18%
MacBook Pro 14 M5APPLERENDER
Probe B
Apple
MacBook Pro 14 M5
61.8/ 100C
Performance52· 35%
Battery & Ports74· 27%
Design· 20%
Display62· 18%
Quick verdict

Between the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) and MacBook Pro 14 M5, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) comes out ahead in storage and refresh rate, while the MacBook Pro 14 M5 wins on claimed battery life and cpu cores. Overall, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 70.4 and the MacBook Pro 14 M5 scores 61.8 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The TUF Gaming A16 (2024) is the clear pick on raw spec strength, leading by 8.6 points on the Mars Score. The margin is wide enough that the underdog only makes sense if its individual strengths line up with what you specifically need.

Pick the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. The biggest gaps in its favor are storage, refresh rate, battery, among others.

Pick the MacBook Pro 14 M5 if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are claimed battery life, cpu cores, thunderbolt ports, among others.

Both ship with comparable ram, backlit keyboard, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins

  • Storage — 100.00% more. 1024 GB vs 512 GB.
  • Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.
  • Battery — 25.00% more. 90 Wh vs 72 Wh.
  • Screen size — 12.68% more. 16 " vs 14.2 ".

Why Apple - MacBook Pro 14 M5 wins

  • Claimed battery life — 140.00% more. 24 h vs 10 h.
  • CPU cores — 25.00% more. 10 vs 8.
  • Thunderbolt ports — 3.00 more. 3 vs 0.
  • Weight — 0.65 kg less. 1.55 vs 2.2.
  • Panel type: Mini-LED (vs IPS).
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Apple - MacBook Pro 14 M5
Weight2.2 kg1.55 kglead
Thickness26.9 mm15.5 mmlead
Build materialplasticaluminum
Backlit keyboardtruetrue
Fingerprint readerfalsetruelead

Display

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Apple - MacBook Pro 14 M5
Screen size16 "lead14.2 "
Refresh rate165 Hzlead120 Hz
Panel typeIPSMini-LEDlead

Performance

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Apple - MacBook Pro 14 M5
CPUAMD Ryzen 9 8945HSApple M5
CPU cores810lead
GPUAMD Radeon RX 7700SApple M5 10-core GPU
RAM16 GB16 GB
Storage1024 GBlead512 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD

Battery & Ports

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Apple - MacBook Pro 14 M5
Battery90 Whlead72 Wh
Claimed battery life10 h24 hlead
USB-C ports23lead
Thunderbolt ports03lead
HDMItruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery life, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or MacBook Pro 14 M5?+

MacBook Pro 14 M5 claims up to 24 hours — 10h vs 24h.

Which is lighter, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or MacBook Pro 14 M5?+

MacBook Pro 14 M5 is lighter at 1.55 kg vs 2.2 kg.

Which has an OLED display, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or MacBook Pro 14 M5?+

Neither model has an OLED display.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.