Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs Apple - MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max

Last updated · How Mars Score works
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUSRENDER
Probe A
ASUS
TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
70.4/ 100B
Performance52· 35%
Battery & Ports88· 27%
Design· 20%
Display77· 18%
MacBook Pro 16 M4 MaxAPPLERENDER
Probe B
Apple
MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
77.3/ 100B
Performance66· 35%
Battery & Ports95· 27%
Design· 20%
Display70· 18%
Quick verdict

Between the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) and MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) comes out ahead in refresh rate, while the MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max wins on claimed battery life / ram. Overall, the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) scores 70.4 and the MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max scores 77.3 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max edges ahead on the Mars Score (70.4 vs 77.3), but the 6.9-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the TUF Gaming A16 (2024) if the display is what you stare at all day — refresh rate, brightness, or sharpness is where the difference will be most visible. The biggest gaps in its favor are refresh rate.

Pick the MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max if your top frustration with your current device is running out of charge before the day ends — endurance is the lead spec here. Its strongest claims are claimed battery life, ram, cpu cores, among others.

Both ship with comparable storage, backlit keyboard, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why ASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins

  • Refresh rate — 37.50% more. 165 Hz vs 120 Hz.

Why Apple - MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max wins

  • Claimed battery life — 140.00% more. 24 h vs 10 h.
  • RAM — 125.00% more. 36 GB vs 16 GB.
  • CPU cores — 100.00% more. 16 vs 8.
  • Battery — 11.11% more. 100 Wh vs 90 Wh.
  • Thunderbolt ports — 3.00 more. 3 vs 0.
  • Screen size — 1.25% more. 16.2 " vs 16 ".
  • Panel type: OLED (vs IPS).
  • Weight — 0.06 kg less. 2.14 vs 2.2.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Design

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Apple - MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
Weight2.2 kg2.14 kglead
Thickness26.9 mm16.8 mmlead
Build materialplasticaluminum
Backlit keyboardtruetrue
Fingerprint readerfalsetruelead

Display

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Apple - MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
Screen size16 "16.2 "lead
Refresh rate165 Hzlead120 Hz
Panel typeIPSOLEDlead

Performance

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Apple - MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
CPUAMD Ryzen 9 8945HSApple M4 Max
CPU cores816lead
GPUAMD Radeon RX 7700SApple M4 Max 40-core GPU
RAM16 GB36 GBlead
Storage1024 GB1024 GB
Storage typeSSDSSD

Battery & Ports

SpecASUS - TUF Gaming A16 (2024)Apple - MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
Battery90 Wh100 Whlead
Claimed battery life10 h24 hlead
USB-C ports23lead
Thunderbolt ports03lead
HDMItruetrue
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Which has better battery life, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max?+

MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max claims up to 24 hours — 10h vs 24h.

Which is lighter, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max?+

MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max is lighter at 2.14 kg vs 2.2 kg.

Which has more RAM, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max?+

MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max offers 36GB of RAM.

Which has an OLED display, TUF Gaming A16 (2024) or MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max?+

MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max has an OLED display; TUF Gaming A16 (2024) uses IPS.

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.