Where they actually differ
The most decisive specs, ranked by how much they matter — before the full spec table.
| Spec | Beelink - EQ14 | Beelink - SER9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | 500 GB | 1024 GB |
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| TDP | 15 W | 65 W |
| Volume | 0.4 L | 0.9 L |
Between the EQ14 and SER9 HX 370, the EQ14 comes out ahead in tdp / volume, while the SER9 HX 370 wins on storage / ram. Overall, the EQ14 scores 67.4 and the SER9 HX 370 scores 70.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The SER9 HX 370 edges ahead on the Mars Score (67.4 vs 70.4), but the 3.0-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the EQ14 if you care most about tdp / volume. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp, volume. The single most decisive one: TDP — 50.00 W less. 15 vs 65.
Pick the SER9 HX 370 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are storage, ram. The single most decisive one: Storage — 104.80% more. 1024 GB vs 500 GB.
Both ship with comparable thunderbolt, so those specs do not separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Which should you buy: Beelink - EQ14 or Beelink - SER9 HX 370?
Beelink - SER9 HX 370 leads the current Mars Score by 3.0 points.The more useful decision is the trade-off behind that result: compare ram, storage, volume, tdp against the way you will actually use the product.
Choose Beelink - EQ14 if…
Beelink - EQ14 has the measurable edge on tdp w, volume l.
Choose Beelink - SER9 HX 370 if…
Beelink - SER9 HX 370 has the measurable edge on storage gb, ram gb.
This is a structured comparison of the published catalog values. It is not a claim of identical real-world performance across every workload; use the linked spec drill-downs and methodology page to inspect the inputs.
Why Beelink - EQ14 wins
- ▲TDP — 50.00 W less. 15 vs 65.
- ▲Volume — 0.50 L less. 0.4 vs 0.9.
Why Beelink - SER9 HX 370 wins
- ▲Storage — 104.80% more. 1024 GB vs 500 GB.
- ▲RAM — 100.00% more. 32 GB vs 16 GB.
Spec comparison
Core
Form & I/O
| Spec | Beelink - EQ14 | Beelink - SER9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 0.4 Llead | 0.9 L |
| Weight | 0.45 kglead | 0.85 kg |
| TDPⓘ | 15 Wlead | 65 W |
| USB ports | 5 | 6lead |
| Thunderboltⓘ | false | false |