Between the EQ14 and SER9 HX 370, the EQ14 comes out ahead in tdp and volume, while the SER9 HX 370 wins on storage and ram. Overall, the EQ14 scores 67.4 and the SER9 HX 370 scores 70.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
The SER9 HX 370 edges ahead on the Mars Score (67.4 vs 70.4), but the 3.0-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.
Pick the EQ14 if you care most about tdp and volume. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp, volume.
Pick the SER9 HX 370 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are storage, ram.
Both ship with comparable thunderbolt, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity tells you both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Beelink - EQ14 wins
- ▲TDP — 50.00 W less. 15 vs 65.
- ▲Volume — 0.50 L less. 0.4 vs 0.9.
Why Beelink - SER9 HX 370 wins
- ▲Storage — 104.80% more. 1024 GB vs 500 GB.
- ▲RAM — 100.00% more. 32 GB vs 16 GB.
Spec comparison
Core
Form & I/O
| Spec | Beelink - EQ14 | Beelink - SER9 HX 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 0.4 Llead | 0.9 L |
| Weight | 0.45 kglead | 0.85 kg |
| TDPⓘ | 15 Wlead | 65 W |
| USB ports | 5 | 6lead |
| Thunderboltⓘ | false | false |
Frequently asked
Spec-level deep dives
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.