Skip to content
vsMars
Head-to-head

Beelink - EQ14 vs Geekom - A8

Last updated · How Mars Score works
EQ14BEELINKRENDER
Probe A
Beelink
EQ14
67.4/ 100C
Core46· 60%
Form & I/O95· 40%
A8GEEKOMRENDER
Probe B
Geekom
A8
73.1/ 100B
Core59· 60%
Form & I/O93· 40%
Quick verdict

Between the EQ14 and A8, the EQ14 comes out ahead in tdp and volume, while the A8 wins on storage and ram. Overall, the EQ14 scores 67.4 and the A8 scores 73.1 on our Mars Score.

Buying advice

Which should you buy?

The A8 edges ahead on the Mars Score (67.4 vs 73.1), but the 5.7-point gap is small enough that the right pick comes down to which spec advantages matter to you.

Pick the EQ14 if you care most about tdp and volume. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp, volume.

Pick the A8 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are storage, ram.

Both ship with comparable thunderbolt, so those specs don't separate the two — focus on the differences below.

Bottom line: the A8 is the safer default. The other model is the right choice only when its specific advantages line up with your priorities.

Why Beelink - EQ14 wins

  • TDP — 50.00 W less. 15 vs 65.
  • Volume — 0.20 L less. 0.4 vs 0.6.

Why Geekom - A8 wins

  • Storage — 104.80% more. 1024 GB vs 500 GB.
  • RAM — 100.00% more. 32 GB vs 16 GB.
Full readout

Spec comparison

Core

SpecBeelink - EQ14Geekom - A8
CPUIntel N150AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
RAM16 GB32 GBlead
Storage500 GB1024 GBlead

Form & I/O

SpecBeelink - EQ14Geekom - A8
Volume0.4 Llead0.6 L
Weight0.45 kglead0.61 kg
TDP15 Wlead65 W
USB ports56lead
Thunderboltfalsefalse
Reader questions

Frequently asked

Drill down

Spec-level deep dives

By manufacturer

More from the same brands

vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.