Between the EQ14 and ThinkCentre M90q Gen 5, the EQ14 comes out ahead in tdp / volume, while the ThinkCentre M90q Gen 5 wins on storage / ram. Overall, the EQ14 scores 67.4 and the ThinkCentre M90q Gen 5 scores 66.4 on our Mars Score.
Which should you buy?
These two are nearly even on the Mars Score (67.4 vs 66.4). The decision is not about overall quality — both clear the bar — it is about which specific trade-offs fit your use.
Pick the EQ14 if you care most about tdp / volume. The biggest gaps in its favor are tdp, volume.
Pick the ThinkCentre M90q Gen 5 if you push the hardware — gaming, on-device AI, heavy multitasking — and the extra compute headroom is worth the trade-offs. Its strongest claims are storage, ram, thunderbolt.
There are no meaningful ties on the headline specs — every popular-comparison metric has a winner.
Bottom line: there is no wrong answer here — match the spec advantages to how you actually use the product. The Mars Score parity says both are well-rounded; the differences are about trade-offs, not quality.
Why Beelink - EQ14 wins
- ▲TDP — 70.00 W less. 15 vs 85.
- ▲Volume — 0.95 L less. 0.4 vs 1.35.
Why Lenovo - ThinkCentre M90q Gen 5 wins
- ▲Storage — 104.80% more. 1024 GB vs 500 GB.
- ▲RAM — 100.00% more. 32 GB vs 16 GB.
- ▲Has Thunderbolt.
Spec comparison
Core
Form & I/O
| Spec | Beelink - EQ14 | Lenovo - ThinkCentre M90q Gen 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 0.4 Llead | 1.35 L |
| Weight | 0.45 kglead | 1.32 kg |
| TDPⓘ | 15 Wlead | 85 W |
| USB ports | 5 | 6lead |
| Thunderboltⓘ | false | truelead |
Spec-level deep dives
More from the same brands
vsMars is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. Learn more.